ABOUT THE UMMS SEPSIS PROGRAM
MEET THE TEAM
Three subgroups of team members from UMMS member organizations are exploring the barriers and opportunities around establishing a better understanding of when and how clinician’s diagnose sepsis.
Thomas Scalea, MD, FACS, MCCM
Samuel M. Galvagno, DO, PhD
Chief Medical Officers and other Clinical Leaders from:
- UM Upper Chesapeake & Harford Memorial
- UM St. Joseph Medical Center
- UM Baltimore Washington Medical Center
- UMMC DTC and UMMC MTC
- UM Charles Regional Medical Center
- UM Shore Regional Health Easton, Chestertown, Dorchester
- UM Rehabilitation & Orthopaedic Institute
- UM Capital Region Health – pending post transition
Information Technology Representatives:
- Clinical Informatics
- Business Intelligence
- Data & Analytics
Project Facilitator:
- Dorsey Dowling, Senior Performance Consultant
OBJECTIVES
This UMMS Sepsis Program’s objective is early identification, standardized evaluation and rapid, standardized intervention to decrease morbidity and mortality:
- Decrease mortality rates to O/E < 0.8
- Decrease readmissions to O/E < 0.8
- Decrease ICU Utilization by unplanned admissions
A Tableau dashboard aids the interrogation of data for promoting timely antibiotic administration within 60 minutes. Related diagnostic processes reduce the time from blood culture order to bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility results.
The program’s core components include:
- Patients presenting to UMMS hospitals via ED or on IP floor with signs of sepsis (patients transferred into the hospital with severe sepsis aren’t currently a part of this evaluation)
- A workflow for evaluating potentially avoidable deaths from sepsis
- A workflow regarding the causes & how to potentially decrease sepsis mortality
- Assessment of the efficacy of the work implemented
- Establishing best practice for earlier implementation of the sepsis bundle
FOCUS AREAS
- Timely Antibiotic Administration – Mary Ghaffari, PharmD
- Infection Management – Jason Heavner, MD
- Sepsis Diagnosis – Co-Leads: Kristie Johnson, PhD and Kimberly Claeys, PharmD
MILESTONES/NEXT STEPS – KEY DATES
RESEARCH & REFERENCE MATERIAL
Resources
Research
- Investigation – Association of a Care Bundle for Early Sepsis Management With Mortality Among Patients With Hospital-Onset or Community-Onset Sepsis
- Article – A Comparative Analysis of Sepsis Identification Methods in an Electronic Database
- Article – Descriptors of Sepsis Using the Sepsis-3 Criteria: A Cohort Study in Critical Care Units Within the U.K. National Institute for Health Research Critical Care Health Informatics Collaborative
- Article – ED Door-to-Antibiotic Time and Long-term Mortality in Sepsis
- Article – National Performance on the Medicare SEP-1 Sepsis Quality Measure
- Article – Time to Recognition of Sepsis in the Emergency Department Using Electronic Health Record Data: A Comparative Analysis of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment
- Literature Review – Time to Antibiotics
Member Organization Updates
FAQs
What is sepsis?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines sepsis as the body’s extreme response to an infection. It is a life-threatening medical emergency that happens when an infection you already have triggers a chain reaction throughout your body. More specific definitions of this condition vary. At UMMS, we are embarking on the difficult—and critical—path of a consistent definition and treatment that will ultimately help us save more lives of patients in our hospitals.
Why are we standardizing our diagnosis and intervention for sepsis?
Despite the significant contribution that sepsis has on morbidity, mortality, and critical care resource utilization, there is notable variation in the diagnosis of sepsis across UMMS—a two-fold difference in diagnosis rate ranging across our hospitals. This rate of sepsis diagnosis varies provider-to-provider, department-to department, and hospital-to-hospital. Standardization of diagnostic criteria is further complicated by the varying criteria used for core measures, the MHAC program, and other quality metrics and reporting requirements around sepsis.
A shared definition of sepsis will enable us to obtain a deep understanding of the impact of our current sepsis processes and programs throughout UMMS. This understanding will inform the next steps in getting the most effective sepsis care to each of our patients at the most appropriate time.
Is sepsis a concern at UMMS more than other hospitals?
No. Sepsis is a concern at all health care facilities across the country. More than 1.5 million people get sepsis each year in the United States; UMMS hospitals treat about 10,000 patients each year with a primary or secondary diagnosis of sepsis. Through this program, UMMS is working to reduce the number of patients who die from sepsis.
How will this work affect clinical team members?
Team members who interact with patients, including nurses, pharmacists, lab technicians and others, will be most affected by changes in our sepsis identification and response. As the program develops, UMMS will provide education and training on all aspects of the new process.
How will this work affect non-clinical team members?
Team members in areas of information technology, CMI coding and quality measurement will also play an integral role in this program as we refine the processes by which we define and record sepsis diagnosis and results in service to our mission of improving patient safety.
How are we measuring this program’s success?
A rigorous approach to data will inform all decisions made by the Sepsis Program committees and all metrics established to measure our progress. These will be shared as they are developed.
Who is involved in the Sepsis Program?
This effort is truly a System-wide, interdisciplinary, coordinated One UMMS effort. Our work groups and committees are comprised of leaders and team members from each member organization and representing diverse stages of care. Member organizations will continue their own process improvement as we simultaneously create a One UMMS approach.
